Article Review On Motivation Myths By Tao De Haas Essay

Motivation Myths By Tao De Haas | Submitted On March 19, 2012 Recommend Article Article Comments Print Article Share this article on Facebook 1 Share this article on Twitter Share this article on Google+ Share this article on Linkedin Share this article on StumbleUpon Share this article on Delicious Share this article on Digg Share this article on Reddit Share this article on Pinterest Expert Author Tao De Haas Myth 1: Motivation is something you ve got or you haven t Fact: Motivation levels are different in different people. Some people seem to be highly motivated most of the time. But before you think you are one of those people with low motivation think again. Generally we are motivated by things that matter to us, by the things we value, that are meaningful and purposeful to us. Those people who are highly motivated often have a very compelling reason to be motivated; the more compelling the reason the higher the motivation. For most people it is a matter of finding out what it is that compels them and motivation will follow. Myth 2: You need to be positive in order to be motivated Fact: While perhaps not obvious on the surface, you might be surprised to learn that fear is often a motivator. Most people would have heard of the carrot or stick principle; move towards the carrot and away from the stick. Some people are motivated by the reward, the gain, while others might be more motivated by fear, discomfort, potential loss or pain. Gain and pain are both

Analysis Of The Book 1984 By George Orwell - 1493 Words

â€Å"In recent months, a series of news reports have brought public attention to the collection of individual data by government agencies.† In discussions of the advanced use of technology, one controversial issue has been the practice of mass surveillance which is used by the American government. On one hand, individuals argue that there are several advantages of surveillance technology; for instance, these types of systems are believed to limit the number of criminal activity within an area and easily detect suspects. On the other hand, others oppose the surveillance theory because they believe that it is against our constitutional right to privacy. My own view is that the technology that we rely heavily upon today is steadily bringing us closer to the world of Big Brother because the government has the ability to collect information from devices that are constantly being in use such as cell phones, televisions, and computers without our consent. In the book entitled 1984, George Orwell reveals how Oceania was a world where no one could be trusted; an action as simple as thinking was considered a violation of the law and you could be arrested for it. Individuals were living in a society where their own thoughts, even the ones which were not projected verbally, could be heard by the government. They were unfamiliar with the boundaries of what is considered to be â€Å"private† and they were constantly reminded by slogans that Big Brother was watching them. Big Brother, a fictionalShow MoreRelatedAnalysis Of The Book 1984 By George Orwell1362 Words   |  6 PagesKathie Tejada Professor Antonio Tomà ¡s Guerrero Dà ­az COLI 214B 1984 This novel, 1984, is a dystopia and takes place in Oceania where people live in a totalitarian society. The author, George Orwell, wrote this as if he was looking into the future and what it was going to turn in to. This group of people, called The Party, have control over everything and everyone, and they have a leader, known as Big Brother, who is everywhere throughout the novel and the people look up to him. They invented a languageRead MoreAnalysis Of The Book 1984 By George Orwell1084 Words   |  5 Pages1984 was written by British author George Orwell. The main character is an average man by the name of Winston Smith. Winston does not agree with the ideals of the party; this gets him arrested by the thought police. 1984 proclaims what could happen if people just let the government do all their thinking for them. 1.In the world of 1984, what is considered orthodox is not the same as the actual world. In the book in order to be considered orthodox one must never question the party or have any individualRead MoreAnalysis Of The Book 1984 By George Orwell1288 Words   |  6 PagesControlled freedom Present day society is very much like society in the book 1984. Although, some of the procedures have diminished slightly, they still do exist, and are still current in today’s society. it’s a shame that most people fail to see that our â€Å"free† nation is actually still controlled. we are being manipulated in such a manner that we do not see by propaganda, media, lies, and yes even torture. Many citizens can say that here in America we are free nation or have freedom, but do weRead MoreAnalysis Of The Book 1984 By George Orwell1088 Words   |  5 Pages1984 The book that I chose for my first book report was 1984 by George Orwell. The story begins by introducing a man named, Winston Smith, a simple man from the country known as Oceania. He lives in a small flat within London, on the Island known as Airstrip One. Winston is a part of the outer party, which is a part of the ruling party within Oceania, and is a low ranking member who works for the Ministry of Truth as a propaganda officer. The people of the ruling party are constantly being watchedRead MoreAnalysis Of The Book 1984 By George Orwell968 Words   |  4 PagesThe book, 1984 by George Orwell, is about the external and internal conflicts that take place between the two main characters, Winston and Big Brother and how the two government ideas of Democracy and totalitarianism take place within the novel. Orwell wrote the novel around the idea of communism/totalitarianism and how society would be like if it were to take place. In Orwell’s mind democracy and communism cre ated two main characters, Winston and Big Brother. Big Brother represents the idea ofRead MoreAnalysis Of The Book 1984 By George Orwell1029 Words   |  5 PagesThe novel 1984, written by George Orwell, depicts a horrendous future in which the citizens of the tyrannous state of Oceania live under unceasing surveillance. The mysterious character of Big Brother serves as the leader of this dystopian society while members of the Party work for total power over the general public. Telescreens are installed in every room for constant investigation, language is continuously modified, and extreme actions are made in order to achieve the end goal of absolute controlRead MoreAnalysis Of The Book 1984 By George Orwell1253 Words   |  6 Pagesno point of trying to live a regular life. In the book 1984 by George Orwell nearly everyone in the book is brainwashed and given a lot of false information. Winston and other characters only provide a little bit of hope. With a little bit of hope i n the brainwashed world there is still absolutely no chance for any recovery unless the upper management screws up. This hope provides nearly no chance of humanity going back to normal. In the book, 1984, Big Brother is watching over everyone at all timesRead MoreAnalysis Of The Book 1984 By George Orwell2321 Words   |  10 Pagespossible crime, thoughtcrime. In the novel â€Å"1984†, by George Orwell, Winston Smith rebelles passively against the idea of living in a complete uniform world under Big Brother’s dreadful surveillance. Thought crime’s impact on the novel’s population is devastating, so much so that it is somewhat hard to picture today’s society in its place. The sad reality is that thoughtcrime does impact the lives of the people in today’s society to some extent as it does in the book. The level of punishment for such a crimeRead MoreAnalysis Of The Book 1984 By George Orwell1092 Words   |  5 Pages and opinions of its citizens; therefore removing the difference between state and society. The goal of a totalitarian government is to replace the existing society with a perfect one. In the novel â€Å"1984† by George Orwell, Big Brother is a dominant figure in the ways which he controls Oceania. Orwell portrays a society with a government that oversees and influences each facet of human life to the point that even having an unfaithful thought that is in disagreement with the law is forbidden. Big BrotherRead MoreAnalysis Of The Book 1984 By George Orwell930 Words   |  4 Pages The book 1984 was filled with constant rebellion from one individual known as Winston Smith who does not believe in the â€Å"Party† and would much rather join the â€Å"Brotherhood† where he can oppose the Party. While in Divergent, Beatrice Prior is loyal and compliant with her government until she learns that she is a rare type of human known as a divergent and poses a threat to her government. These two stories while incredibly different have many similarities as well. Both stories are about people trying

The World Trade Organization Free Essays

The courage and dedication that was displayed by the protestors in the video was what I took to heart. It was something else to see a group of people come together to protest something that they believed so strongly despite being pepper sprayed, shot at with rubber bullets, and thrown into jail†¦.. We will write a custom essay sample on The World Trade Organization or any similar topic only for you Order Now But why would anyone go to these lengths to protest against an organization? The World Trade Organization was created in Jan. 1 1995 and has 140 member countries. According to their official website www. wto. org the organizations main purpose is to, â€Å"help trade flow as freely as possible-so long as there are no undesirable side-effects. This partly means removing obstacles. † However the organization isn’t a democratic organization. Instead the WTO rules are written by and for corporations with inside access to the negotiations. Citizen input by consumer, environmental, human rights and labor organizations is consistently ignored as WTO meetings are held in secret. According to the video, out of the 100 largest economies in the world, 51 are corporations and only 49 are countries. As a result it is no wonder why so many came to protest this secret meeting held in Seattle, WA. According to the video many protestors argued that the WTO and its motto of free world trade is stomping over labor and human rights in countries throughout the world as the use of cheap labor and child labor are continually ignored by the WTO. The magazine Global Exchange states that the WTO is blocking human rights abuses since they have ruled that, â€Å"1) It is illegal for a government to ban a product base on the way it is produced and 2) Governments cannot take into account the behavior of companies that do business with vicious dictatorships such as Burma. The protestors in the video also felt that the WTO was destroying the environment. Evidence of this, dates back to 1993 when according to the Global Exchange, â€Å"The very first WTO panel ruled that a regulation of the US Clean Air Act, which required both domestic and foreign producers alike to produce cleaner gasoline, was illegal. Recently, the WTO declared illegal a provision of the Endangered Species Act that requires shrimp in the US to be caught with an inexpensive device that allows endangered sea turtles to escape, and the WTO is currently negotiating an agreement that would eliminate tariffs on wood products, which would increase the demand for timber and escalate deforestation. As a result I believe that these corporations should not be allowed to continue to get away with such actions. The people in Seattle honored their legal right to assemble. The actions taken by the city of Seattle against these protestors were too extreme and I’m still unclear for what reason they took such extreme measures against the protestors. These were peaceful protests and the city freaked out over a few broken windows at corporations such as Starbucks and Nike. In my point of view the steps taken by the city of Seattle was way over the line and its disgusts me that peaceful protestors were thrown into jail for demonstrating a legal right in the constitution. How to cite The World Trade Organization, Essay examples

Obesity Outline free essay sample

Parents are overweight; child tends to adopt eating and physical activity habits. V. Health factors a. Hormone problems may cause obesity i. Hypothyroidism 1. Define: â€Å"Hypothyroidism is a condition characterized by abnormally low thyroid hormone production. There are many disorders that result in hypothyroidism. These disorders may directly or indirectly involve the thyroid gland. Because thyroid hormone affects growth, development, and many cellular processes, inadequate thyroid hormone has widespread consequences for the body (Medicine. et). http://www. medicinenet. com/hypothyroidism/article. htm 2. â€Å"Cushings syndrome is a condition in which the bodys adrenal glands make too much of the hormone cortisol. Cushings syndrome also can develop if a person takes high doses of certain medicines, such as prednisone, for long periods IV. Other factors†¦ a. Age- muscle loss can slow the rate of calorie burning b. Medications c. Emotional eating d. Smoking- when people quiet food tastes and smells better VI. We will write a custom essay sample on Obesity Outline or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Health problems a. Coronary heart disease i. Definition b. High blood pressure c. Stroke d. Sleep apnea e. Gallstones VII. Solutions a. Exercise b. Healthy eating choices c. Portion control d. Support groups- A support group is formed by people who are dealing with common issues and â€Å"meet on an ongoing basis to cope with stress, give each other suggestions, provide encouragement, convey information, and furnish emotional support.

Essay on Business Ethics

Essay on Business Ethics Essay on Business Ethics Essay on Business EthicsWhat is the Categorical Imperative? How are the principles of Universalizability, Dignity of Persons, and the Kingdom of Ends derived from this Deontological Theory?Immanuel Kant is an outstanding philosopher who managed to give explanation to various concepts regarding responsibility and morality. Kant states that responsibility can be viewed as moral action that has its value. Kant defined the Categorical Imperative as â€Å"the statement of the moral law, or of supreme principle of morality† (De George 64). According to his philosophy, the principles of duty can make any action a Categorical Imperative, while any purpose that affects an action is Hypothetical Imperative. According to Kant, there can be only one Categorical Imperative, which was identified in his formulas of universal law. The Categorical Imperative is connected not only with the matter of the action, but also it is connected with its form and the principles followed by it. As a resul t, the Categorical Imperatives ignore any purposes and outcomes of the action. De George states that technical terminology of Kant helps to better understand the nature of the moral law. According to Kant’s philosophy, â€Å"the moral law commands categorically, not hypothetically† (De George 64). The Categorical Imperative differs from Hypothetical Imperative. According to De George, â€Å"the Categorical Imperative supplies the basic criterion of morality, even though in ordinary life we tend to solve moral problems by using second-order moral principles or rules†(70). Thus, the Categorical Imperative should not be applied to any situation.   One of the examples of the application of the Categorical Imperative is Ten Commandments, which reflect human morality, grounded on ethical principles.The principles of Universalizability, Dignity of Persons, and the Kingdom of Ends are derived from this Deontological Theory. According to Deontological Theory, some acti ons may be prohibited, while other actions may be obligatory. The principles of Universalizability can be viewed as a Deontological Principle, because it reflects Deontological Ethics. According to Kant’s philosophy, there may be only one Categorical Imperative, which is represented in three formulations: the universal principle of the law of nature, the principle of ends, and the principle of autonomy. These principles are called the principles of Universalizability. Nevertheless, it becomes clear that the principles of Universalizability do not generate any concrete norms of action, morally permissible. According to De George, According to De George, the Deontological Theory considers that â€Å"being moral is the same as being rational† (24). If a principle can be regarded as moral or rational, it must refer to Universalizability, and should be applied to everyone and to any situation. The Principle of Ends says, â€Å"So act as to treat humanity, whether in your o wn person or in that of any other, in every case as an end, and never as merely a means† (qtd. in De George 66). Each individual can be regarded as a rational being as he/she has a dignity. This fact means he/she should never be exploited as a means to generate good. The principles of Universalizability, Dignity of Persons, and the Kingdom of Ends are derived from Deontological Theory because of the morality of actions. According to Kant, the major principle of morality must be focused on the moral law that has universalizability characteristics, applied at all times to any moral agent.Thus, the Categorical Imperative is a significant criterion that helps to evaluate morality and moral principles. Kant’s philosophy claims that it is necessary to derive morality from reasoning. Morality depends on moral good. Deontological Theory generates the Categorical Imperatives that stand for the duties independent of any theory of good, placing emphasis on the action rather than o n the results or outcomes. Deontological Theory helps to solve the problems of morality. De George states that Kant’s moral theory is deontological because he is focused on the actions that are considered to be morally right in their motives, and that should be derived from duty rather than from inclination.Question 2What is the distinction between causal responsibility and moral responsibility? What are, if any, the excusing conditions for moral responsibility? What role do these excusing conditions play in terms of a) moral responsibility and b) moral accountability?There is the distinction between causal responsibility and moral responsibility. De George, the outstanding American philosopher, states that moral responsibility can be lessened in case of excusing conditions, which may prevent the individual’s action, making it impracticable. Moral responsibility can be viewed as a minefield as it is based on the concepts that do not include obligation or freedom of cho ice. It is possible to punish an individual on the account of his/her moral responsibility. However, causal responsibility has a different meaning because it depends on someone’s will. Let’s take another example: self-defense and murder. An individual may be causally and morally responsible for an action. In some cases, causal responsibility can be viewed as an essential condition of moral responsibility. De George states, â€Å"I am responsible for having hit him† (100). An individual may not be morally responsible for this action, but he/she will be causally responsible in any case. In other words, an individual may be causally responsible for some action if he played some role in bringing this action about. An individual may be morally responsible for some action if he/she not only played some role in bringing some action about, but also he/she initiated or organized some events which led to the occurrence of the action. It is necessary to understand the sign ificance of moral responsibility for business organizations. According to De George, causal responsibility is â€Å"an ingredient in both moral and legal responsibility† (100). De George believes that the chain of responsibility can be represented as a long chain, which involves individuals to bear both causal responsibility and moral responsibility. There is much evidence that causal responsibility is part of moral responsibility. For De George, it is very important that corporations are guided by corporate members who play the role of moral agents. This fact means that corporations can be morally evaluated.  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   There are two types of excusing conditions for moral responsibility. These excusing conditions include ignorance and force. According to De George, â€Å"excusing conditions supply reasonable ways for lessening or predicting moral responsibility†(103). An individual may be morally responsible for the action, but because of excusing conditions, he/she is not responsible. Excusing conditions help to mitigate moral responsibility. For example, in the law, excusing conditions are recognized, and the murder committed of passion is considered to be less serious that the murder committed as a premeditated murder (De George 103). Moral responsibility is associated not only with the following concepts: â€Å"duty, obligation, possibility, knowledge, freedom and choice,† but also with â€Å"liability, accountability, age, praise, blame, intention, pride, shame, remorse, conscience and character† (De George 104).  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   Moral accountability is a rather complicated concept as it is focused on an individual’s obligation and willing to act. Moral accountability can be found at all organizational levels in any business organization. An individual is ready to give an account of another individual’s action. According to De George, different members of an organization should be morally accountable for their actions. Accountability is focused on an individual’s explanation of one’s responsibility for some actions. Excusing conditions play an important role in terms of moral accountability. According to De George, moral accountability consists of being prepared to render a moral account of an action either for ourselves or as agents for others†(105). This fact means an individual should be ready to give an account of his/her actions, for which he/she bears responsibility. Nevertheless, it is necessary to mention that a moral account of an individual’s actions cannot be given clearly in moral terms.Essay on Business Ethics part 2

When To Keep That

When To Keep That When To Keep â€Å"That† When To Keep â€Å"That† By Maeve Maddox Since the 9th century, the word that has been one of the most frequently used words in the English language. It functions as pronoun, adjective, adverb, and conjunction. A browser search for â€Å"that† brings up 14,490,000,000  hits. Small wonder so many copy editors do their best to stamp out that whenever possible. One editor tells his authors to search their manuscript for all uses of the word that and then â€Å"Evaluate each and delete 95% with no loss of meaning.† I’d say that 95% is a bit high, but writers can reduce the number in a great many instances without loss of meaning. On the other hand, that should not be purged blindly in a misguided effort to save words. The following statement by a police spokesman quoted in a newspaper account illustrates the natural use of that in spoken English: We have to make sure that there is nobody inside any house; theres always the potential that our suspects have fled into a house that was occupied, which is why its highly important to us to make sure thats not the case. Four thats occur in this sentence: 1. conjunction introducing a noun clause that is the direct object of â€Å"to make sure.† 2. conjunction introducing a fuller explanation of the noun potential. 3. relative pronoun standing for house and introducing the adjective clause â€Å"that was occupied† 4. demonstrative pronoun, subject of is (â€Å"that is not the case†). Two thats can be dropped without loss of meaning: We have to make sure there is nobody inside any house; theres always the potential our suspects have fled into a house that was occupied, which is why its highly important to us to make sure thats not the case. A third that can be eliminated with a slight rewording: We have to make sure there is nobody inside any house; theres always the potential our suspects have fled into an occupied house, which is why its highly important to us to make sure thats not the case. How does one decide whether to keep or omit that? Clarity is the main consideration. Will the reader understand the sentence without it? Some readers may stumble over a missing that. A writer’s preferred style is another determining factor. My own style tends to be rather heavy on the use of that. For example, I would probably keep that after potential in the original quotation. A writer may feel that a sentence flows more smoothly with that than without it. That can usually be omitted after the verb say: Dickens said that he wrote A Christmas Carol as a â€Å"pot-boiler.† Dickens said he wrote A Christmas Carol as a â€Å"pot-boiler.† But even with the verb say, if an adverbial element intervenes between the verb and the clause, that is needed: Dickens said in an interview that he wrote A Christmas Carol as a â€Å"pot-boiler.† Dickens said years later that he wrote A Christmas Carol as a â€Å"pot-boiler.† When in doubt, keep the that. As it says in The AP Stylebook, â€Å"Omission can hurt. Inclusion never does.† Use that to introduce a clause that follows any of the following verbs: advocate assert contend declare estimate make clear point out propose state Want to improve your English in five minutes a day? Get a subscription and start receiving our writing tips and exercises daily! Keep learning! Browse the Style category, check our popular posts, or choose a related post below:36 Adjectives Describing LightProved vs. ProvenProverb vs. Adage

End-of-Life Ethical Dilemma for Nurses Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

End-of-Life Ethical Dilemma for Nurses - Essay Example In a qualitative study, the differences in the ethical burden on end-of-life decisions between nurses and doctors were determined.   Although the research covered small sampling, which included seven doctors and 14 nurses working in critical areas, it never failed to convey the universal dilemma encountered by healthcare workers which is the struggle to arrive at a conclusive and moral decision regarding euthanasia.   Furthermore, the study’s findings concluded that the main difference in mercy killing is that physicians are to deal with the â€Å"decision making itself† whilst nurses have to â€Å"live with these decisions†.   Mercy killing is the kind of problem that does not leave the patient the sole right to decide.   It comes in varied forms of condition where the end result is the termination of the life of the patient.   Although a patient voluntarily requests for the termination of his life, ethical considerations must be taken into account.   More often a terminally ill patient is depressed so that the only solution he regards to, is death.   This issue leaves nurses and physicians the responsibility of determining the mental and emotional capability of the patient to decide for himself.   There is also the issue of the legality of the family to represent the unconscious, clinically dead patient and to request for discontinuation of life support.  Ã‚   Across the world, euthanasia has occupied a constant seat in the debate regarding morality.